Operator Objective Function Guidance for a Real-Time Unmanned Vehicle Scheduling Algorithm

Abstract

Advances in autonomy have made it possible to invert the typical operator-to-unmanned-vehicle ratio so that a single operator can now control multiple heterogeneous unmanned vehicles. Algorithms used in unmanned-vehicle path planning and task allocation typically have an objective function that only takes into account variables initially identified by designers with set weightings. This can make the algorithm seemingly opaque to an operator and brittle under changing mission priorities. To address these issues, it is proposed that allowing operators to dynamically modify objective function weightings of an automated planner during a mission can have performance benefits. A multiple-unmanned-vehicle simulation test bed was modified so that operators could either choose one variable or choose any combination of equally weighted variables for the automated planner to use in evaluating mission plans. Results from a human-participant experiment showed that operators rated their performance and confidence highest when using the dynamic objective function with multiple objectives. Allowing operators to adjust multiple objectives resulted in enhanced situational awareness, increased spare mental capacity, fewer interventions to modify the objective function, and no significant differences in mission performance. Adding this form of flexibility and transparency to automation in future unmanned vehicle systems could improve performance, engender operator trust, and reduce errors.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA577490

Entities

People

  • Andrew K. Whitten
  • Andrew S. Clare
  • Jonathan How
  • Missy Cummings
  • Olivier Toupet

Organizations

  • Air Force Test Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • C4I
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Sensors
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Algorithms
  • Cognitive Workload
  • Command And Control
  • Control Systems
  • Ground Control Stations
  • Guidance
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Motion Planning
  • Reaction Time
  • Rules Of Engagement
  • Scheduling (Production)
  • Simulations
  • Unmanned
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • Unmanned Surface Vehicles
  • Unmanned Vehicles

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Operations Research
  • Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Autonomous Capabilities and Mission Reconnaissance.

Technology Areas

  • Autonomy
  • Autonomy - Human-Robot Interaction