Talking Past Each Other? How Views of U.S. Power Vary Between U.S. and International Military Personnel

Abstract

This Paper addresses the question of whether anecdotally observed friction between U.S. military personnel and their international partners stems from underlying bias or other factors that cannot be practically remedied. After providing a backdrop of the types of friction that have been observed, and that seem to be escalating, the Paper examines alternative theoretical explanations for such friction. The friction mirrors, in a sense, the broader sharpening of anti-U.S. sentiment observed throughout much of the globe over the past decade. There are two broad explanatory approaches: the friction and sentiment stem from who we are and are thus immutable; or they stem from discrete actions and policies, and thus may be ameliorated to some degree.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA578610

Entities

People

  • Richard H. Outzen

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Commerce
  • Department Of Defense
  • Globalization
  • Governments
  • International Relations
  • Market Economy
  • Military Education
  • Military Operations
  • Military Personnel
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Social Problems
  • Sociopolitics
  • Students
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Educational Psychology
  • Theoretical Analysis.