Absent Authority: Failure to Plan Funding and Command Authorities in USAF Security Assistance Units
Abstract
This thesis will look at the capability development of U.S. Air Force Building Partnership/Building Partner Capacity (BP/BPC) units using current programs such as the 6th Special Operations Squadron, and detailed case studies of Farm Gate and the current Mobility Support Advisory Squadron (MSAS). The focus is on both success and where the U.S. Air Force falls short when developing BP/BPC capability. The thesis follows the planning process and initial assumptions of both Farm Gate and the MSAS with a breakdown of the two major planning oversights. First, the study will examine the lack of funding authority as a problem that needs correction at a Headquarters Air Force and legislative level by creating a globally applicable authority for building partnership. Second, the study will focus on problems with Command Authorities, specifically the unwillingness of Air Mobility Command (AMC) to transfer authority to the Geographic Combatant Command (GCC). Finally, potential solutions and recommendations on all levels are proposed, from the unit to national-level policy. The paper reveals shortfalls in the planning process, but it also shows the extraordinary efforts of the Airmen involved in the squadrons. From Farm Gate to the MSAS, the ultimate success of these efforts has come on the backs of professionals who stand-up the squadrons.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 01, 2013
- Accession Number
- ADA579747
Entities
People
- Steven A. Marshall
Organizations
- Naval Postgraduate School