An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Success of Expeditionary Civil Engineer Hub-and-spoke Organizations

Abstract

Expeditionary Air Force Civil Engineer support to recent operations in southwest Asia created a unique organizational learning environment, particularly related supporting the general engineering requirements of geographically separated units in a manpower-constrained contingency environment. One of the direct results of this organizational learning was the hub-and-spoke expeditionary engineer unit featuring elements of both RED HORSE and Prime BEEF capabilities operating with theater-wide visibility of infrastructure requirements. This study acquired insights from literature and a purposeful sample of subject matter experts about operational advantages this hub-and-spoke unit offered compared to those offered by strictly legacy organizational models. The research used a Delphi method of expert opinion elicitation to which of these may be applicable in future contingency environments with caveats, constraints, and conditions that CE force planners should consider for hub-and-spoke organizations. The expert panel demonstrated consensus on 20 advantages and associated success factors, including resource cross-leveling flexibility, optimized organizational proximity to key support functions like logistics and contracting, centralized engineering functions, and better-defined command relationships in Joint environments.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA583624

Entities

People

  • Joshua A. Hager

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Business Administration
  • Civil Engineering
  • Combat Operations
  • Combat Readiness
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Delphi Method
  • Employment
  • Engineers
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Operations Research
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Systems Analysis and Design