Twenty Years of Evolutionary Change in the Department of Defense's Civil Support Mission

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, the Department of Defense's response enterprise for civil support missions has experienced evolutionary change and almost exponential growth. Three events served as the catalysts for the changes: the Tokyo Subway Sarin Gas attack, the 9/11 attacks, and Hurricane Katrina. Each event exposed critical shortfalls in the nation's, as well as DoD's, ability to respond to a domestic catastrophe in enough time to produce a life-saving effect. Once derived solely from warfighting capabilities that could be applied to domestic assistance, DoD now maintains Title 10 and Title 32 units, teams, and task forces specifically designed for civil support missions. Not only are DoD's capabilities split among two different Federal statutes, the Department has created a dichotomy in its response enterprises, one designed specifically to respond to a catastrophic CBRN incident and one to respond to incidents without a CBRN element. DoD can no longer afford to maintain this dichotomy, in part because of the duplicity of the capabilities involved, but also because the dichotomy is not in line with current DoD strategy and doctrine for an all-hazards approach to civil support.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 23, 2013
Accession Number
ADA583721

Entities

People

  • Michael R. Anderson

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Department Of Homeland Security
  • Emergency Response
  • Employment
  • Health Services
  • Homeland Security
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • United States Government
  • United States Northern Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.