Combining Concepts: Operational Shock in Insurgencies

Abstract

The focus of this work is to determine whether the concept of operational shock, which has served as the intellectual underpinning of the U.S. Army's doctrine over the past 30 years, can be used to guide an operational approach in a counterinsurgency campaign. The American way of war now focuses not on the destruction of an enemy's equipment and personnel, but on degrading and disrupting his ability to continue to fight. Much of counterinsurgency doctrine and theory does not fit this operational logic. The previous decade of war has led to a renewed debate both in public and inside the national security apparatus of the United States. With the publication of Field Manual 3-24: "Counterinsurgency," the United States produced its first doctrine dedicated to countering insurgency in over 20 years. The logic within FM 3-24 dictates that if the counterinsurgent can dissolve the conditions that enabled the existence of the insurgency, governmental forces can change the logic of the population. The monograph posits that to effectively set conditions to affect the logic of the population, the counterinsurgent must affect the logic of the insurgency it is opposing. The intent is neither to prove nor disprove either the enemy-centric or population-centric models of counterinsurgency, but instead to argue that there must be a balance of both approaches. There may be a time during a counterinsurgency campaign in which the disruption of the insurgency's logic, and causing a fractionalization within the enemy system should be the focus of the counterinsurgent's operations. The monograph examines the theoretical basis for both operational and counterinsurgent doctrine. It then combines these two concepts to provide a theoretical model of an insurgency in a state of shock. Two historical case studies are presented in which the counterinsurgent force, using different force structures and capabilities, were able to effectively shock the systems of the insurgencies they opposed.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 23, 2013
Accession Number
ADA583823

Entities

People

  • Ryan J. Bulger

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Adaptive Systems
  • Civil War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Counterinsurgency
  • Geography
  • Insurgency
  • Intelligence Collection
  • Military Organizations
  • National Governments
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Second World War
  • Security
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Sociology

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies