The New NATO Policy Guidelines on Counterterrorism: Analysis, Assessments, and Actions

Abstract

The history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) will say that the first, and so far only, time NATO has called upon its Article 5 collective defense clause was on September 12, 2001, following a terrorist attack on one of its members. Yet, until the agreement by NATO Heads of State and Government on the new policy guidelines on counterterrorism on May 20, 2012, NATO did not have an agreed policy to define its role and mandate in countering terrorism. In the 11 years that have followed the 9/11 attacks on the United States, NATO has opted for a pragmatic approach to the fight against terrorism and succeeded in identifying its added value. The result has been a series of substantial counterterrorism activities. Their impact, however, has been mitigated by the lack of an agreed policy defining NATO s rightful place among international counterterrorism actors. The evolving nature of the terrorist environment and of the global responses required has made it necessary to reassess the threat posed by terrorism and its implications for the Alliance. The new NATO policy guidelines on counterterrorism are the result of a comprehensive intellectual and political process that started with the 2010 Strategic Concept and led to the conclusion that in an era in which emerging challenges blend collective defense with the broader concept of collective security, the lens of collective interest must replace the prism of national perspectives. With this in mind, the overall judgment on the new policy guidelines can and should be positive. Conceptually, the guidelines translate the notions of prevention and resilience into NATO policy and anchor its counterterrorism activities to the Alliance s core tasks of collective defense, crisis management, and cooperative security. In substance, the new policy guidelines focus on NATO s strengths, such as intelligence-sharing, capacity-building, special operations forces, training, and technology and capabilities.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA585205

Entities

People

  • Marie-theres Beumler
  • Stefano Santamato

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Airborne Warning And Control System
  • Criminals
  • European Union
  • Homeland Security
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Governments
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • Societies
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • International Relations and Conflict Resolution
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Systems Analysis and Design