The Problem with Precision: Managing Expectations for Air Power

Abstract

Much of the literature concerning aviation-related civilian casualties of the past decade centers on ethics, human rights, laws of warfare, and the number of occurrences. A critical perspective is missing from this discussion, that of the Airman. An Airman's voice is needed, not only to ground the discussion in practical reality, but also to place into context the development of unrealistic public expectations- expectations that work against airpower's ability to achieve political aims. This paper examines the manner in which civilian casualty avoidance has affected airpower's effectiveness in achieving policy objectives in Afghanistan today, and how atrophy in strategic communications has failed to create realistic public expectations. The author identifies four areas where a change in perspective of how airpower is viewed would be beneficial: the execution of airpower, the perspective of scholars, terminology used by airpower advocates, and the United States approach to strategic communication. Changing mindsets is these areas will help create realistic expectations and improve the overall effectiveness of airpower; while preserving the military s quest for perfection and meeting the American desire for moral exceptionalism in warfare.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA589415

Entities

People

  • Jill A. Long

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircrafts
  • Bomber Aircraft
  • Department Of State
  • Employment
  • Guided Bombs
  • Human Rights
  • International Law
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Precision-Guided Munitions
  • Recreation
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.