Determining Factors for EU Military Intervention

Abstract

The United States has long urged greater contributions to regional security by its allies. Given the Obama administration's shift in emphasis to Asia, it is reasonable for the United States to urge the European Union (EU) to play a greater role in regional security. However, arguing for a greater role does not produce actual commitments. Hence, an important question for U.S. military planners is as follows: When will the EU actually commit forces to regional security missions? An analysis of EU security policy and military engagement decisions identifies the core factors that persuade EU members to approve regional security missions. The three EU military engagement case studies chosen for this monograph are the 2006 EU military operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUFOR RD Congo), the EU decision not to commit forces to Lebanon in 2006, and the EU decision to enforce a maritime zone off the coast of Somalia in 2008 (EUNAVFOR Atalanta). These case studies were selected because they illustrate the recent maturation of EU security policy, which has evolved to embrace regional security missions. The case studies show that there are specific conditions that must apply before the EU makes a decision to intervene. There must be clear EU interests involved; an international basis for mission legitimacy; and a willingness on the part of Britain, France, and Germany to provide operational leadership. In addition, the EU will not intervene in open armed hostilities; that is, the intervention will enforce a settlement, it will not produce a settlement. Understanding the criteria that must be met before the EU considers undertaking military operations can help U.S. strategic and operational planners develop "economy of force" approaches that complement both U.S. and EU interests. The analysis also can provide a common frame of reference for senior U.S. decision makers concerning the EU's aspirations to be a credible global security player.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 23, 2013
Accession Number
ADA589624

Entities

People

  • Robert S. Perry

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Case Studies
  • Civil War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • European Union
  • Foreign Policy
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Operations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Regional Security
  • Terrorists
  • Treaties
  • United States

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design