Using Leading Indicators to Improve DoD Acquisitions

Abstract

Leading indicators can help the Department of Defense (DoD) achieve product development success by drawing attention to essential elements that are automatically controlled within the commercial sector -- and are thus often overlooked by the DoD. We note that the use of any cost control approach requires a trained and experienced acquisition workforce. The workforce must have sufficient understanding of industry behavior and incentives to achieve the desired results. We have derived several features of product development that we believe can inform the creation of meaningful leading indicators. We contend that these indicators can be used in two distinct ways. First, the use of indicators will ensure that fewer programs will begin development on a weak case, thus avoiding a costly, though all too common, mistake -- initiating a program that should have not been started. Second, the use of leading indicators will provide program managers with earlier warnings of impending difficulties as a program progresses, which program managers can take into account to correct minor difficulties before they become costly revisions. We describe several indicators in this report: Initial Program Requirements, Technology Readiness, Senior Leadership, Program Managers, Supporting Staff, Requirements Volatility, Contract Changes, Budget Stability, Funding Flexibility, and Manufacturing Readiness.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA591931

Entities

People

  • Jacques Gansler
  • William Lucyshyn

Organizations

  • University of Maryland

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Business Administration
  • Governments
  • Human Behavior
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Acquisition
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Short Takeoff Aircraft
  • Systems Engineering
  • Tactical Aircraft
  • Test And Evaluation

Readers

  • Computer Science.
  • Economics
  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).