Comparison of a Visual and Head Tactile Display for Soldier Navigation
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the advantages of a head-mounted tactile display (HMTD), compared with a map for Soldier navigation in an urban environment, while concurrently detecting hostile threats. Many technological solutions that provide the Soldier an advantage over the enemy are visually-driven and collectively are in danger of overloading the Soldier s visual capacity, but the tactile modality has been identified as a promising alternative to the visual modality for increasing Soldier performance. Twelve warfighters participated in the study. Each served at least one tour of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan. Participants completed four routes in Middle East (ME) and United States urban virtual environments using a map or an HMTD, while also scanning for and detecting threats. Data were collected for various performance measures, overall workload ratings and a questionnaire. Overall workload significantly decreased by 37.8% when participants used the HMTD, as opposed to the map, to navigate the ME environment. The HMTD was advantageous for decreasing participants perceived overall workload associated with a complex environment. Thus, for complex environments, off-loading the navigation task to a nonvisual modality and reserving visual resources for the task of detecting threats can unburden Soldiers by reducing their overall workload.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Dec 01, 2013
- Accession Number
- ADA593250
Entities
People
- Joel T. Kalb
- Kathy Kehring
- Kim F. Fluitt
- Kimberly Myles
Organizations
- United States Army Research Laboratory