Strategic Leader Readiness and Competencies for Asymmetric Warfare

Abstract

Both current and past senior civilian defense officials reportedly have grown increasingly frustrated with the conventional mindset of many strategic-level military officers. In their view, too many senior leaders are too cautious, lacking the "fresh thinking, creativity, and ingenuity" to engage in the "out-of-the- box" thinking required to fully understand the new asymmetric threats and challenges posed by the global war on terrorism. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in a speech delivered at National Defense University on 31 January 2002, made clear that in his view, "The future will require us to think differently and develop the kinds of forces and capabilities that can adapt quickly to new challenges and unexpected circumstances." General Richard B. Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also recently noted how al Qaeda and Taliban fighters have "made lots of adaptations to our tactics and we've got to continue to...try to out-think them and to be faster at it." At the heart of the issue is whether and how the operational art and leadership attributes differ, if at all, in symmetric versus asymmetric approaches to warfare. The conceptual underpinning of these statements and criticisms also raises significant questions about whether asymmetric warfare poses unique challenges for strategic leaders or whether it more appropriately requires time-tested leadership competencies applied with more creativity and risk-taking. The answers to these important questions would seem to hold great significance for strategic leaders' readiness and the leadership competencies needed for asymmetric warfare. This article seeks to identify the adaptive linkages that exist between strategic leader competencies and the mental readiness for asymmetric and more conventional warfare. Fortunately, the writings of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz seem to offer a framework to help guide the needed adaptation in strategic leader thinking with regard to asymmetric approaches to warfare.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2003
Accession Number
ADA597387

Entities

People

  • Thomas J. Williams

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Center Of Gravity
  • Human Behavior
  • Mental Processes
  • Military Education
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Situational Awareness
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • Thinking
  • Vulnerability
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Systems Analysis and Design