The Debate is Over: Close Air Support in Korea and Vietnam

Abstract

The effectiveness of Marine Corps tactical aviation lies in Marine Corps doctrine; consequently, the Marine Corps provided the most effective close air support possible during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. During Korea and Vietnam, the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps called on Marine Corps aviation and the U.S. Air Force to deliver close air support. The two services held divergent views on the close air support mission. The Air Force viewed close air support as a contingency, whereas Marine aviation made close air support its primary mission. Therefore, divergent perspectives affected service doctrine and planning for close air support. Due to the integration of air and ground elements in Marine doctrine and practice, Marine aviation proved itself more effective in Korea and Vietnam. The Marine Corps provided the most effective close air support due to training, aircraft, and decentralized command and control. Air Force tactical aviation took a backseat to strategic nuclear doctrine. The Air Force lacked integration with the Army and close air support suffered due to the disconnected relationship.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 03, 2011
Accession Number
ADA601237

Entities

People

  • Jeremy W. Siegel

Organizations

  • Marine Corps University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Counter WMD
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Airframes
  • Bombing
  • Combat Operations
  • Doctrine
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Military Aviation
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Rotary Wing Aircraft
  • Second World War
  • Tactical Air Support
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Environmental science

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Science

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3