Risky Business: Risk Tolerance in U.S. Army Special Forces

Abstract

This research looks at the issue of risk tolerance, and analyzes its role in U.S. Army Special Forces (SF). More specifically, it assesses the degree to which senior members of an organization allow junior members to make autonomous decisions, and argues that the unconventional warfare (UW) mission and nature of SF call for a higher degree of risk tolerance than is seen in conventional forces. A longitudinal case study of the conflict in Afghanistan shows that in 2001 SF had a long leash to allow for autonomy and flexibility, which was necessary to succeed in a UW environment. However, by 2006, the leash was shortened and more control measures were implemented. While a short leash may be appropriate for a conventional battlefield, it adversely impacts SF effectiveness in a UW environment. The three main reasons that induce risk aversion in SF leaders are exogenous political factors, organizational considerations including chain of command, and organizational culture, which is reinforced by the current Army officer evaluation system. This analysis suggests that the deleterious impact of these factors needs to be addressed in SF.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2014
Accession Number
ADA607644

Entities

People

  • Brian G. Mulhem

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Case Studies
  • Command And Control
  • Commerce
  • Green Berets
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Recreation
  • Second World War
  • Special Forces
  • Special Operations Forces
  • Unconventional Warfare
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Irregular Warfare and Special Operations Cyberspace Operations against Adversarial Threats.
  • Military Engineering.
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.