United States Army Field Artillery and the Hybrid Threat: Is it Time to Get Smart?

Abstract

Is the United States Army Field Artillery still capable of successfully countering the Hybrid Threat, and what role would precision smart munitions play in developing such a capability? Precision smart munitions were, at one time, considered a necessary capability, but as time progressed and new threats developed, the need for such a capability dwindled. Previous research examines whether current capabilities can doctrinally employ field artillery, but there is little research examining whether or not doctrinally employed field artillery is capable of addressing the Hybrid Threat described in current Army doctrine, specifically the threat of conventional enemy forces. In this thesis I examine U.S. Army Field Artillery doctrine, organization, and materiel and determine that capability gaps do exist against the conventional forces of the Hybrid Threat. While smart munitions are not the only solution to these gaps, this thesis argues that they do offer a solution and provides recommendations as to how they can better prepare the U.S. Army Field Artillery for future adversaries.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 13, 2014
Accession Number
ADA611101

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey R. Fuller

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter IED
  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Artillery
  • Artillery Ammunition
  • Artillery Fire
  • Fire Control Systems
  • Guided Projectiles
  • Howitzers
  • Indirect Fire
  • Military History
  • Munitions Testing
  • Precision-Guided Munitions
  • United States
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.