Unit Reconstitutions: Combat Stress as an Indicator of Unit Effectiveness

Abstract

What is the role of combat stress control in Army unit reconstitutions that follow traumatic events? US Army doctrine on reconstitutions, which dates back to 1992 but was most recently revised in 2014, now fails to incorporate combat and operational stress control (COSC) as a key component of the regeneration process. With an eye toward the role commanders play in planning, preparing, and synchronizing reconstitutions after traumatic events, I examine reconstitution and COSC manuals to produce a theory positing that unit effectiveness varies with the steps military leaders take to incorporate COSC into reconstitution plans. I then test my theory using three historical cases, while also reflecting on one personal case (to wit, my experience reconstituting B Troop, 3-61 CAV after the Battle of COP Keating).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 13, 2014
Accession Number
ADA611627

Entities

People

  • Stoney L. Portis

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Combat Operations
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Health Services
  • Logistics
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Education
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • Psychiatry
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Therapy
  • United States Military Academy
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerial Delivery - Logistics and Supply Chain Management.
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Systems Analysis and Design