Interactive Effects of Cognitive Representations of Formidability and Technology on Aggression
Abstract
This project demonstrated that, in individual decision making, a single cognitive representation captures the three components of threat assessment: fighting capacity of the foe relative to self, likelihood that the foe will attack, and assets at risk if the foe attacks. The visualized physical size and strength of an individual foe, or of a representative of an enemy coalition, summarizes these assessments and their constituents. This was explored by manipulating (a) the fighting capacity of the assessor; (b) the fighting capacity of the foe; and (c) the likelihood that the foe would attack; and by examining (d) natural variation in assets at risk. In the final year, research was published on the contributions to representations of a potential foe of i) own physical strength (per [a]); ii) participation in synchronized behavior (per [a]); iii) knowledge of another's propensity to take risks (per [c]); iv) status as a parent (per [d]); and v) hormonal status (per [d]). Papers under review or in preparation address vi) cultural stereotypes regarding the propensity toward violence (per [c]); vii) signals of commitment to a hostile coalition (per [c]); viii) the role of personality (per [c]); and ix) the effects of religious cognition (per [a]). In sum, employing simple, field-deployable methods suitable for use with pre-literate populations, it is possible to assess diverse components of judgments of the threat posed by potential adversaries.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Sep 08, 2014
- Accession Number
- ADA612540
Entities
People
- Daniel M. Fessler
Organizations
- University of California, Los Angeles