Did Senior British Officers Effectively Lead Change?

Abstract

There has been considerable change in the British Army over the last five years. Financial considerations were paramount as the British Army sought to transform and meet the future operating environment. This thesis researched how the changes were perceived by majors who promoted in 2012. The research was mixed, and contained both a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. The responses were transposed onto a civilian change model by Hal Rainey and Sergio Fernandez, to assess how well the changes were led in the British Army. Three key areas were identified. First, the perception that the cohort felt they had little to no involvement or input into change. Second, the communication of change was not persuasive enough. Finally, that there was a perceived lack of a plan or how change was to be enacted. All these areas negatively affected the perception of change overall and how it was led. Nevertheless, these observations and areas for improvement were always couched in a realistic appreciation of the environment in which change was carried out: non-conducive and constrained. Finally, and with potentially the most far-reaching repercussions for the future, there were also perceived negative affects caused by change on the British Army's culture.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 12, 2014
Accession Number
ADA613507

Entities

People

  • Gordon W. Muir

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Business Administration
  • Combat Support
  • Data Analysis
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Lessons Learned
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Structure
  • Perception
  • Public Administration
  • Training
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.