A Case Study in Locating the Architectural Roots of Technical Debt
Abstract
Our recent research has shown that, in large-scale software systems, defective files seldom exist alone. They are usually architecturally connected, and their architectural structures exhibit significant design flaws which propagate bugginess among files. We call these flawed structures the architecture roots, a type of technical debt that incurs high maintenance penalties. Removing the architecture roots of bugginess requires refactoring, but the benefits of refactoring have historically been difficult for architects to quantify or justify. In this paper, we present a case study of identifying and quantifying such architecture debts in a large-scale industrial software project. Our approach is to model and analyze software architecture as a set of design rule spaces (DRSpaces). Using data extracted from the project s development artifacts, we were able to identify the files implicated in architecture flaws and suggest refactorings based on removing these flaws. Then we built economic models of the before and (predicted) after states, which gave the organization confidence that doing the refactorings made business sense, in terms of a handsome return on investment.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jan 16, 2015
- Accession Number
- ADA614220
Entities
People
- Andriy Shapochka
- Lu Xiao
- Qiong Feng
- Ran Mo
- Rick Kazman
- Serge Haziyev
- Volodymyr Fedak
- Yuanfang Cai
Organizations
- Carnegie Mellon University