A Note on Causes of Effects

Abstract

Interest in applying counterfactual logic to legal settings has resulted in disagreements regarding the proper interpretation of the legal term "but for," as in "It is more probable than not that the injury would not have occurred but for the defendant action" (Robertson, 1997). Let A = 1 stands for the defendant's action, R = 1 for the observed response (e.g., injury or damage), and R0 (respectively R1) for the value that R would have had the action not taken (A = 0). The standard interpretation of the "but for" criterion is captured by the inequality PN greater or equal to 1/2 where PN stands for counterfactual probably PN = P(R0 = 0/A = 1,R = 1) (1) termed "probability of necessity" in Pearl (2000a).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 29, 2014
Accession Number
ADA614361

Entities

People

  • Judea Pearl

Organizations

  • University of California, Los Angeles

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Science
  • Computer Science
  • Computers
  • Experimental Data
  • Greenland
  • Identification
  • Language
  • Law
  • Mathematical Analysis
  • New York
  • Probability
  • Probability Distributions
  • Scientific Literature
  • Standards
  • Universities

Readers

  • Analytical Mechanics
  • Criminal Law
  • Theoretical Analysis.