An Interview with Samuel J. Locklear III

Abstract

The strategy that the President put out last year could not have been better timed. The strategy was a byproduct of discussions we were all having about what happens to the U.S. military the joint force as we go forward into the future after what we believe will be the conclusion of more than 10 years of war in the Middle East. Our forces have to be very much appreciated for the magnificent work they have done there under some difficult challenges and environments. To some degree it has shaped our joint force in a way that might not be the best for what we see as our emerging interests in the 21st century. So what this rebalance represents is a hard look at where the interests of the United States are and what will concern our children and grandchildren most in the future. Every vector pointed to the Asia-Pacific and, in fact, the Indo-Asia- Pacific in significant ways where not only our security interests will be at stake but our economic interests, too. That s kind of where this started. So I was lucky to come into this job with that kind of guidance.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2013
Accession Number
ADA617429

Entities

People

  • William T. Eliason

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Asia
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Education
  • Information Operations
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • North Korea
  • Pacific Ocean
  • Security
  • Ships
  • United States
  • United States Pacific Command
  • Uss George Washington
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.