Purple Reign: Ascent and Decline of Joint Behavior in the U.S. Military

Abstract

The U.S. military sends mixed messages about the degree to which it embraces and practices jointness. Official publications tend to reflect a high degree of inter-service cooperation and interdependence, though history and practical experience reveal frequent bouts of dysfunction and willful independence. There also seems to be disagreement about what constitutes the essence of jointness. Various experts argue that combined-arms success lies in the proper arrangement of forces under a commander with sweeping authority, which reduces squabbles about doctrine and command-and-control issues that periodically plague large operations. Others characterize jointness as the possession of compatible military hardware or the procurement of common equipment. The former allows interdependence on the battlefield; the latter can strengthen national defense by furthering both combined action and fiscal efficiency.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2014
Accession Number
ADA620991

Entities

People

  • Paul R. Birch

Organizations

  • Air University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Autonomy
  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircraft Industry
  • Airframes
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Geography
  • Military Applications
  • Military Aviation
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Recreation
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Strategic Security Studies

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control