The Quest for Achilles Shield: Is the American Military's Fetish with Technology Harming Mission Accomplishment?

Abstract

United States combat operations and stability and support operations in Afghanistan and Iraq revealed a number of strategic, operational and tactical - level challenges . Chief among them was the effect the enemy s use of IEDs had on United States and allied operations. The typical response to most problems, with the possible exception of the surge of troops in both theaters, was technological. The technological efforts to counter the effects of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) met with mixed results. The development of dismounted mine detectors allowed Soldiers to identify IEDs , reducing casualties while conducting dismounted operations. The addition of electronic jamming equipment, both vehicle-mounted and dismounted, reduced the impact of IED attacks for these forces as well. While these technological solutions proved beneficial in the execution of assigned missions, the force protection technologies were less effective. The Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) series of vehicles provided Soldiers with greatly increased armored protection while conducting patrols and other combat operations. But solving this problem resulted in a vehicle that was too large to easily transit the battlespace, had minimal troop carrying capability (depending on the variant), and further isolated the Soldier from the population. This technological solution to the IED problem resulted in a series of vehicles that made the accomplishment of the primary mission, securing th e population, more difficult. This follows a trend in the United States of focus ing primarily on technological solutions for every problem. Without a comprehensive and shared understanding of the strategic and operational environment, the acquisition of technological solutions like the MRAP generate unforeseen second and third order effects that negatively impact the ability of units to accomplish their mission.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 12, 2015
Accession Number
ADA622146

Entities

People

  • Charles S. Armstrong

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter IED
  • Electronic Warfare
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Armored Vehicles
  • Combat Operations
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Employment
  • Explosive Devices
  • Explosives
  • Improvised Explosive Devices
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Personnel
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare
  • Weapons Effects

Readers

  • Economics
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Autonomous Capabilities and Mission Reconnaissance.

Technology Areas

  • Microelectronics