Improving Government Procurement: Lessons from the Coast Guard's Deepwater Program

Abstract

The Coast Guard launched the Deepwater contract in 2002 to much fanfare promising a new paradigm for managing large government contracts. The Coast Guards aim was to establish a contracting paradigm founded on a cooperative partnership between government and industry in order to cut through the rigid regulations and red tape that killed contracts through a thousand small wounds. The Deepwater contract gave the vendor, Integrated Coast Guard Systems (ICGS), very broad responsibilities and discretion to achieve the Coast Guard's goals, promising that the vendor's high performance would be rewarded with financial bonuses. Four years later, after a series of highly publicized problems with patrol boats that the Coast Guard was buying, the Deepwater partnership was over. While ICGS was successfully delivering some Deepwater ships and aircraft to the Coast Guard, other vessels were over-budget and behind schedule. By 2009, the Coast Guard was back to using traditional contracting approaches to overhaul its fleet: buying assets one at a time, scrambling to hire more contract managers, and relying on a regulations and enforcement approach to acquire the Deepwater system. In many ways the Deepwater contract was designed according to contract management principles that call for a less rule-bound and more fluid contracting process. Instead of specifying at the outset how the Coast Guard expected this system and its components to work, the Coast Guard allowed the vendor to specify the system as it was built and deal with unforeseen challenges as they arose. The promise of Deepwater was that a public-private partnership, guided by performance goals would deliver a more innovative and cost-effective solution than a contracting regime governed by rules that rigidly specified all of the system's inputs, activities, and outputs in advance. Our review of the Deepwater program suggests that the program's problems stemmed from several sources.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 17, 2010
Accession Number
ADA629496

Entities

People

  • David Van Slyke
  • Matthew Potoski
  • Trevor Brown

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Autonomy
  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Aircrafts
  • Business Administration
  • Coast Guard
  • Congress
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Management Personnel
  • Marine Transportation
  • National Security
  • Political Science
  • Procurement
  • Public Administration
  • Public Policy

Readers

  • Government Contracting/Procurement.
  • Maritime Security/Maritime Homeland Security
  • Systems Analysis and Design