Effect of Camouflage on Visual Detection

Abstract

Two laboratory experiments were conducted on a terrain model to assess the effects of pattern, range, lighting, and location on the ability of subjects to visually detect tank targets. In Experiment I, each subject saw one of four patterns (MERDC, Swedish, German, or olive drab) at two ranges. The MERDC pattern took longest to detect. There was no difference due to range. In Experiment II, each subject saw all five patterns (MERDC, Swedish, British, German, and olive drab) at each of eight locations under either diffuse or bright/shadow lighting conditions. There was no difference due to pattern. It was more difficult to find a target in some locations, although location interacted with lighting condition. It took longer to detect targets when shadows were present.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1975
Accession Number
ADB004971

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey D. Grossman

Organizations

  • Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Artillery
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • California
  • Corporations
  • Detection
  • Military Research
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Target Acquisition
  • Terrain Models
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Visual Acuity
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Atmospheric Science / Meteorology, specifically Wind Wave Turbulence.
  • Atmospheric Science/Meteorology
  • European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).