Visual Compensatory Tracking Performance after Exposure to Flashblinding Pulses. I. Comparison of Human and Rhesus Monkey Subjects

Abstract

To assess the validity of using macaques as human analogues in further flash-blindness studies, three rhesus monkeys and eight human subjects were exposed to identical flashblinding light pulses while performing identical visual compensatory tracking tasks. The light source was a 3400-K tungsten- halogen lamp; optics and shutter were arranged so that a 0.1-sec flash deposited a total energy of 20.7 micro J over a 3-mm-diameter spot on the retina. Flashblindness recovery time was determined by examining the tracking error trace immediately after treatment. A total of 160 human and 97 rhesus treatments were recorded. Average recovery time for the humans was 2.8 + or - 0.6 sec; for the rhesus, 3.2 + or - 1.1 sec. This close agreement was found in spite of different tracking control strategies used by human and rhesus subjects. Rhesus monkeys were judged acceptable as human analogues for this specific type of testing.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADB056770

Entities

People

  • Grant D. Callin
  • James V. Devine
  • Paul Garcia

Organizations

  • University of Texas at El Paso

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerospace Medicine
  • Air Force
  • Analogs
  • Animals
  • Computers
  • Control Sticks
  • Diameters
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Light Sources
  • Prostheses And Implants
  • Psychology
  • Radiation
  • Rhesus Monkeys
  • Standards
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Test And Evaluation

Readers

  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.