Fraud in Air Force Contracting: Are Suspension and Debarment Effective Deterrents at Base Level?

Abstract

This thesis examines the effectiveness of suspension and debarment as deterrents to fraud in Air Force contracting at the base level. After the pertinent background information was reviewed, data from three sources was gathered and analyzed. The first source of data were historical statistics on Air Force suspension and debarment dating from FY84 to present. The second source of data were the perceptions of 169 base level contracting officers who participated in a structured survey. The final source of data were the perceptions of suspension and debarment experts/policy makers in the DOD, HQ, USAF, HQ, JAG, HQ, OSI, and HQ IG who participated in the informal interview. The results of the research indicate that the suspension and debarment process of the Air Force is perceived as effective, but there is room for improvement. Based on the findings and analysis, the author suggests several constructive recommendations that, if implemented, could enhance the effectiveness of the Air Force suspension and debarment process. Keywords: Contract law; Contract administration.

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1986
Accession Number
ADB107123

Entities

People

  • Robert W. Shuping

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Contract Administration
  • Contracts
  • Data Science
  • Information Science
  • Perception
  • Statistics
  • Surveys

Readers

  • Defense Financial Management and Audit.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Proposed Air Force Base Actions.
  • Organizational Psychology.