NATO - Unity and Reality
Abstract
One of the functions of a lesser ally is to be irresponsible in a thoroughly responsible way, to be emboldened rather than cowed by the fact that its position is rarely decisive-provided, of course, that its freedom of speech and action is restrained by due deference to the obligations of those who carry the burden of power. Because a great power, the United States in particular, must sustain the framework of security, it is, of necessity, more cautious and conservative than auxiliary powers in adopting strategic and diplomatic ideas which threaten the status quo with imponderable elements. This is not to say that Americans have in fact lacked boldness in exploring fresh concepts; recognition of the unique power of their own government to determine the nature of East-West relations has inspired Americans to a good deal more imaginative thinking than can be found elsewhere in fields such as arms control. Yet the United States Government must, by reason of its decisive responsibility, be canny about moving from tried to untried positions, much more so than countries whose heresies cannot do mortal damage to the alliance if they should be proved wrong. This special need to be conservative is something which allies must respect more patiently. They must also recognize that because they are dependent on United States strength, they must be careful not to commit themselves to heresies without being confident that their commitment will not seriously embarrass the position of their champion.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 01, 1964
- Accession Number
- ADB241433
Entities
People
- John C. Holmes
Organizations
- Center for Strategic and International Studies