Human Aptitude Ability Assessment Techniques for System Designers

Abstract

Modern weapon systems are increasing in sophistication and man- machine interface complexity, while the manpower pool to operate and maintain these systems is decreasing in terms of both numbers of individuals and the aptitudes, abilities and skills those individual bring into the Army. This situation leads to the necessity of considering human resources as a parameter of weapon system design, but such an effort is severely handicapped by a lack of efficient and reliable techniques that can be used by designers to estimate the human resource implications of their designs. The Army Research Institute (ARI) is currently pursuing a research program to develop a human aptitude/ability assessment technique for use during weapon system design. The basic approach is a taxonomy similar to that developed by Fleishman but computerized for greater efficiency and with heavier emphasis on cognitive factors. Research concerns within this project include: Whether a branching or an exhaustive assessment technique is more effective, what is the appropriate level of analyses jobs or tasks, should the method of qualitative analysis be discrete or continuous, and what is the effect of having different types of users of the assessment procedures.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1981
Accession Number
ADP001368

Entities

People

  • James D. Baker
  • Paul G. Rossmeissl
  • Stanley J. Kostyla

Organizations

  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerospace Industry
  • Air Force
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • California
  • Computers
  • Design Criteria
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Human Resources
  • Human-Machine Interfaces
  • Military Research
  • Motor Skills
  • Psychology
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Taxonomy
  • United States
  • Virginia
  • Weapon Systems

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.