Kitchensink Titrations,

Abstract

While most laboratories use more and more expensive equipment for their analyse, this speaker insists on delaying progress by using ultrasimple equipment, available in any laboratory, to perform potentiometric titrations. While not all the data presented will be pertinent to the propellants and/or explosives analyst, we hope to demonstrate that established standard methods need not necessarily always be followed. We have used hyperbole in our title to get your attention; we will endeavor to show, however, (and have done so extemporaneously in this forum in the past) that knives, forks, beer cans, pencils can indeed be used as potentiometric sensors. This will be shown for the following titrations: Fluoride vs F-precipitating species such as La(3+), Aluminum vs fluoride (pertinent to propellants), Phosphate vs Pb(2+), La(3+), Ce(3+), Halides vs Ag(+), Sulfate vs Ba(2+) and Pb(2+). Potentiometric titrations can be carried out with very simple equipment: a pH/millivolt meter, a buret, a sensing electrode, and a reference electrode. We investigated metallic sensors such as copper, stainless steel, and aluminum for the potentiometric titration of some common anions: fluoride, halides, sulfate, and orthophosphate.

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1985
Accession Number
ADP004992

Entities

People

  • W. S. Selig

Organizations

  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Sensors

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aluminum
  • Buildings And Structures
  • Colorado
  • Electrodes
  • Explosives
  • Fluorides
  • Halides
  • Materials Laboratories
  • Propellants
  • Research Facilities
  • Stainless Steel
  • Standards
  • Steel
  • Titration

Readers

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Electrochemical Surface Science
  • Materials Science and Engineering.