A Bayesian View of Assessing Uncertainty and Comparing Expert Opinion
Abstract
A Bayesian approach to the problem of comparing experts or expert systems is presented. The question of who is an expert is considered and comparisons among well-calibrated experts are studied. The concept of refinement, in various equivalent forms, is used in this study. An informative example of the combination of the opinions of well-calibrated experts is described. Total orderings of the class of well-calibrated experts are derived from strictly proper scoring rules. Keywords: predictions; Forecasters; Well calibrated; Expert systems; Combining opinion; Scoring rules.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 16, 1987
- Accession Number
- ADP005295
Entities
People
- Morris H. Degroot
Organizations
- Carnegie Mellon University