Issues Surrounding Comparative Risk Assessments of Operational Materials: An Example with Air Force Hydraulic Fluids,

Abstract

New products entering today's marketplace frequently undergo toxicity testing to determine the potential risks they pose to exposure people. Not commonly, these products undergo more extensive testing than materials that have been in use, are often products intended for the same end use, and may have completely different toxicity profiles in test animals. Differences in the nature of the products, the amount of toxicity data available, and differing target tissues for the materials complicate comparisons of the potential human health hazards of various products. Especially difficult interpretive issues arise when new products cause effects in experimental animals that, for compelling biological reasons, are not expected to occur in humans or other primates. Some of these issues in comparative health risk assessment of new materials are highlighted by Air Force-sponsored studies of a candidate nonflammable hydraulic fluid based on polychlorotrifluoroethylene oligomers. This material has performance characteristics similar to hydrocarbon- and phosphate ester-based fluids that are currently in use

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1993
Accession Number
ADP008719

Entities

People

  • David R. Mattie
  • Harvey J. Clewell Iii
  • Melvin E. Andersen

Organizations

  • University of Wisconsin–Madison

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Animals
  • Fluids
  • Hydraulic Fluids
  • Laboratory Animals
  • Materials
  • Organophosphates
  • Risk
  • Risk Analysis
  • Toxicity

Readers

  • Economics
  • Polymer Science and Engineering.
  • Systems Analysis and Design