Comparative Assessment of Torso and Seat Mounted Restraint Systems using Manikins on the Horizontal Impulse Accelerator

Abstract

The Aircrew Biodynamics and Protection (ABP) Team of AFRL (711 HPW/RHCPT) and their in-house technical support contractor, Infoscitex, conducted an experimental effort involving a series of -X-axis and X/ Z-axis impact tests on the Horizontal Impulse Accelerator (HIA). The purpose of the tests was to perform a comparative assessment of seat and torso mounted restraint systems during both horizontal and combined horizontal impacts. Parametric assessment was also conducted with other parameters including acceleration magnitude, headrest position relative to seatback tangent plane, and head supported mass (helmet system). Overall, the series of comparative assessments indicated that a forward headrest of 2.5 relative to the seat back had minimal effect on the biodynamics response regardless of seat tilt position. The heavy helmet of 5 lb with a forward CG shift generated greater biodynamic responses for both the LOIS and the LARD manikin with the LOIS Nij and neck tension values exceeding the AFRL limits.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2017
Accession Number
AD1044874

Entities

People

  • Chris Albery
  • Chris Burneka
  • Chris Perry
  • John Buhrman
  • Rachael Christopher

Organizations

  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Actuators
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Angular Acceleration
  • Cameras
  • Coordinate Systems
  • Data Analysis
  • Data Sets
  • Ejection
  • Ejection Seats
  • Escape Systems
  • Impact Acceleration
  • Measurement
  • Spinal Injuries
  • Spine
  • Test Facilities
  • Wounds And Injuries

Readers

  • Explosive Engineering.