Comparison of Control Methods in a Frequency Stabilized Laser.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare two types of control methods that can be used to frequency stabilize a laser. The first method uses a single piezoelectric transducer (PZT) to control the cavity length of a helium-neon laser. The second method employs dual PZT controllers of different lengths so that a fast response time can be achieved with the benefit of a large dynamic range. Two variations of the first method are compared to the second method. The first variation uses an integrator with gain as a compensator in electronic feedback control loop and is designed using steady state analysis. The second variation uses a more sophisticated compensator that is designed using frequency analysis. Frequency analysis is also used in the compensator design for the second method. Each compensator is tested in a laser control loop and the results of each method are compared. (Author)

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1980
Accession Number
ADA085707

Entities

People

  • Robert D. Luzitano

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Advanced Electronics
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Closed Loop Systems
  • Control Systems
  • Detectors
  • Frequency Response
  • Helium Neon Lasers
  • Laser Applications
  • Laser Mirrors
  • Laser Resonators
  • Lasers
  • Piezoelectric Transducers
  • Plastic Explosives
  • Refractive Index
  • Resonance
  • Resonant Frequency
  • Signal Generators
  • Test And Evaluation

Fields of Study

  • Physics

Readers

  • Control Systems Engineering.
  • Optical Fiber Sensing and Electromagnetic Propagation.
  • Optical Physics and Photonics.

Technology Areas

  • Directed Energy
  • Microelectronics
  • Microelectronics - Microelectromechanical Systems