Junior Officer Competency Model: Research Results and Applications

Abstract

Through the methodology of Job Competence Assessment this report identified a set of individual attributes required for effective performance as a junior officer. From an initial target sample of 300 junior officers in six branches (Infantry, Field Artillery, Air Defense, Artillery, Engineer, Signal and Transportation/Quartermaster) at four Army installations (Forts Braggs, Carson, Riley and Stewart) a final sample of 56 superior and 49 satisfactory performers were identified. Found to clearly distinguish between superior and average performers were the following competencies: planning, initiative, concern for standards, self-confidence, job involvement, willingness to confront others, concerns with image, concern for clarity and realistic positive attitudes. In addition, four measurement instruments to (1) evaluate the performance of junior officers and (2) assess the effectiveness of various ROTC training programs, were developed. A combination of these instruments was found to be needed to predict both overall ratings and individual competencies. Keywords: Army personnel, Army training, Job analysis, Job training, Officer personnel, Performance(Human), Performance tests, Reserve officer training corps, Job performance, Personnel evaluation, Program evaluation.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 1988
Accession Number
ADA193517

Entities

People

  • Bernard J. Cullen
  • George O. Klemp Jr.
  • Richard S. Mansfield

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Artillery
  • Body Weight
  • Business Administration
  • Construction
  • Databases
  • Drug Abuse
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Factor Analysis
  • Job Analysis
  • Management Personnel
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Surveys
  • Task Performance And Analysis
  • Word Processors

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.