The Case for U.S. Participation in NATO Multinational Corps

Abstract

The massive political changes underway in Europe have necessitated a rethinking of U.S. strategy and force structure in NATO. Two guiding requirements are clear. First, the Federal Republic of Germany must lose its characterization of singularization brought on by the presence of a sizeable number of allied forces stationed on its soil. Second, it is absolutely imperative that the U.S. Army remain stationed in Europe in order to guard against residual Soviet military threats and assuage Bonn's neighbors of its continued benign external intentions. The solution to both challenges is the organization of multinational corps in NATO in the Allied Forces Central Europe (AFCENT) command area, accompanied by the abolishment of CENTAG and NORTHAG with multinational corps reporting directly to AFCENT. This study describes the political rationales for the creation of multinational corps in NATO, and presents a national corps structure for the AFCENT region. It also argues the case for the organization of special functional multinational corps to meet future European and U.S. security requirements.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 05, 1990
Accession Number
ADA229099

Entities

People

  • Karl H. Lowe
  • Thomas-Durell Young

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Arms Control
  • Central Europe
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Geography
  • Germany
  • Governments
  • Instructors
  • International Relations
  • Military Operations
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Students
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).
  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.