NATO Out-of-Area Operation, Necessary or Not?

Abstract

Some believe NATO should establish a multinational reaction force which could be used to respond to security threats outside Europe. NATO currently has its plate full with the uncertainties and instability that exist within its designated area. Although the Soviet threat is diminishing, instability in Eastern Europe is increasing. A review of three out-of-area disputes is conducted to determine if the lessons learned can provide guidance for future responses. The disputes during the Cold War era portrays the divergent interest of nations who have legitimate out-of-area interests, but who are not supported by the other nations, for fear of being guilty by association or for fear of being drawn into a conflict where they do not believe their survival interest are threatened. As Europe enters a new era, NATO must continue to provide common defense. The uncertainties and instabilities that exist in its area provides a vehicle for the nations to retain a common thread. Without common interest, it will be difficult to get a consensus on conducting out-of- area operations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 20, 1991
Accession Number
ADA240464

Entities

People

  • James L. Booker Sr

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Eastern Europe
  • European Communities
  • Germany
  • International Relations
  • Lessons Learned
  • Market Economy
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • Nato Forces
  • New York
  • North America
  • Treaties
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Western Europe
  • Yugoslavia

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Systems Analysis and Design