The Integrated Division - Leveraged Diversity for the 21st Century.

Abstract

Component parochialism within America's Army is counter-productive. This adversarial relationship is creating a 'lose-lose' situation for our Army as a whole. One of the battles being waged is over the National Guard combat divisions. Some believe they are not relevant and should be eliminated from the Army force structure. Others believe they are more relevant today, as American citizens and their elected congressional representatives look for additional peace dividends, than ever before. An initiative offered by the National Guard's leadership to integrate regular Army commanders into National Guard units is a step in the right direction. However, this is only a small part of what could be done. Cultures within the regular army and the National Guard are different in many ways. These cultural differences have driven a wedge between the components, a wedge not experienced between other services and their reserve component counterparts. Total Army integration would leverage the diversity found in both components. This diversity could be a force multiplier and contribute to higher combat readiness for America's Army. Cultural differences should be recognized as a strength. We need to leverage our diversity in order to build the Army for the 21st century that is able to accomplish the full spectrum of missions: 'One Army - One Mission.'

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 07, 1997
Accession Number
ADA326866

Entities

People

  • David W. Raes

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Budgets
  • Combat Forces
  • Combat Readiness
  • Computers
  • Economic Analysis
  • Federal Budgets
  • Governments
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • Information Systems
  • Military Operations
  • Military Strategy
  • Militia
  • National Security
  • Security
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Strategic Security Studies