Regional Analysis of Lg Attenuation: Comparison of 1-D Methods in Northern California and Application to the Yellow Sea/Korean Peninsula

Abstract

The measurement of regional attenuation Q(1) can produce method dependent results. The discrepancies among methods are due to differing parameterizations (e.g., geometrical spreading rates), employed data sets (e.g., choice of path lengths and sources), and methodologies themselves (e.g., measurement in the frequency or time domain). We apply the coda normalization (CN), two-station (TS), reverse two-station (RTS), source-pair/receiver-pair (SPRP), and the new coda-source normalization (CS) methods to measure Q of the regional phase, Lg (Q(Lg)), and its power-law dependence on frequency of the form Q(Of) with controlled parameterization in the well-studied region of northern California using a high-quality data set from the Berkeley Digital Seismic Network. We test the sensitivity of each method to changes in geometrical spreading, Lg frequency bandwidth, the distance range of data, and the Lg measurement window. For a given method, there are significant differences in the power-law parameters, Q(o) and eta, due to perturbations in the parameterization when evaluated using a conservative pairwise comparison. The CN method is affected most by changes in the distance range, which is most probably due to its fixed coda measurement window. Since, the CS method is best used to calculate the total path attenuation, it is very sensitive to the geometrical spreading assumption. The TS method is most sensitive to the frequency bandwidth, which may be due to its incomplete extraction of the site term. The RTS method is insensitive to parameterization choice, whereas the SPRP method as implemented here in the time-domain for a single path has great error in the power-law model parameters and eta is greatly affected by changes in the method parameterization. When presenting results for a given method it is best to calculate Q(of) for multiple parameterizations using some a priori distribution.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA518897

Entities

People

  • Douglas S. Dreger
  • Kevin Mayeda
  • Luca Malagnini
  • Sean R. Ford
  • W. S. Phillips
  • William R. Walter

Organizations

  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Attenuation
  • Bandwidth
  • California
  • Data Sets
  • Explosions
  • Extraction
  • Frequency
  • Frequency Bands
  • Frequency Domain
  • Ground Based
  • Measurement
  • Monitoring
  • Nuclear Explosions
  • Time Domain
  • Two Dimensional
  • United States

Readers

  • Regression Analysis.
  • Seismology