Methodology to Assess Field of View of Maxillofacial Protective Devices

Abstract

The frequency of maxillofacial battlefield injuries has steadily increased since World War II. While anecdotal reports from the Army aviation community credit maxillofacial shields (MFSs) with preventing aircrew injury during aviation mishaps, however no MFS exists to prevent combat-related maxillofacial injuries to ground Warfighters. MFSs that attach to combat helmets are being developed to provide facial protection to ground and mounted troops. An important consideration when developing maxillofacial protective devices is to achieve a balance between the protective coverage and the field of view (FOV) blockage induced by wearing MFSs. This study compared subjective and objective methodologies to measure the FOV of proposed MFSs. This evaluation showed that the use of objective methodology yield similar results compared to the subjective FOV methodology. The use of the objective FOV methodology will expedite the test and evaluation of future MFSs and give more accurate results by eliminating the variability induced by differences in subject responses.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA568432

Entities

People

  • Josue Sosa
  • José E. Capó-aponte
  • Steve W Martin
  • William Mclean

Organizations

  • United States Army Aeromedical Research Lab

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Army Aviation
  • Biomedical Research
  • Bone Fractures
  • Combat Injuries
  • Craniocerebral Trauma
  • Data Analysis
  • International Organizations
  • Iraqi-War
  • Jaw
  • Measurement
  • Second World War
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • War
  • Warfare
  • Wounds And Injuries

Readers

  • Circadian Sleep-Wake Regulation and Chronobiology
  • Quantum spin resonance or Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectroscopy.
  • Systems Analysis and Design