Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security/Countering Nuclear Threats

Abstract

This program coordinates system development and demonstration for nuclear and conventional physical security equipment (PSE) technology and systems as well as for countering nuclear threats throughout DoD. The funding has been centralized in this Defense-wide Program Element (PE) since the early 1990s and represents a substantial portion of all DoD PSE RDT&E funding. The program supports the protection of DoD personnel and facilities in tactical and fixed scenarios for both the nuclear and conventional environments. Priorities for this Program Element’s RDT&E efforts are driven by inputs from QDR guidance, COCOMs (Joint Urgent Operational Need Statements {JUONS}), Services, analysis reports, such as “Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort Hood (January 2010), the Integrated Unit, Base, and Installation Protection (IUBIP) Cost Benefits Analysis (CBA), and DoD Directive 5210.41M (Nuclear Weapon Security Manual: DoD Nuclear Weapon Environment-Specific Requirements) directed requirements and associated Deviation Reports. The funds are used to provide PSE advanced component development and prototypes for individual Service and Joint requirements that lead to capability in three functional mission areas: (1) nuclear physical security; (2) countering nuclear threats; and (3) conventional physical security. The projects under the Program Element either (a) lead to Programs of Record, (b) become technology insertions into existing programs; or (c) advance to being a certified COTS product. The overall program element initiatives are coordinated by three Groups: the Security Policy Verification Committee (SPVC), the Countering Nuclear Threats Working Group (CNTWG) and the Physical Security Equipment Action Group (PSEAG). The SPVC, with Air Force, Navy and Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) membership, reviews and prioritizes nuclear physical security and countering nuclear threat requirements and recommends technology projects for solutions: the CNTWG has oversight over CNT projects, and the PSEAG, with membership by all four Services and DTRA, performs similar functions for conventional requirements and solutions. When applicable, projects overlap both the nuclear and conventional environments, seeking synergism and commonality in solutions. With few exceptions, each Service sponsors RDT&E efforts for technologies and projects that have COCOM and multi-Service applications. To avoid duplication, the SPVC and PSEAG assign projects to the Services and DTRA, as directed in DoD Instruction 3224.03, to assure continuity and development of expertise in Department-wide key technology areas. Specific examples include the Army being responsible for Interior and Exterior Detection, Security Lighting, Security Barriers and Security Display Units; the Air Force for Exterior Detection/Surveillance, Entry Control, Delay/Denial, Tactical Systems and Airborne Intrusion; the Navy for Waterside Security, Explosive Detection, and Locks, Safes and Vaults; and, under direction from DoD Directive 5210.41M, DTRA for security of Navy and Air Force nuclear assets.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
R2 Budgetary Justification
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2012
Source ID
0604161D8Z_5_0400_PB_2012
Change Summary Explanation
Reprogramming was used to accommodate the maturation of PSE developmental items from advanced engineering development (BA 4) to system development and demonstration (BA 5). A reduction in PE 0603161D8Z funding reflects the additional funding in this PE. Defense Efficiency – Baseline Review. As part of the Department of Defense reform agenda, implements a zero-based review of the organization to align resources to the most critical priorities and eliminate lower priority functions. Defense Efficiency – Report, Studies, Boards and Commissions. As part of the Department of Defense reform agenda, reflects a reduction in the number and cost of reports, studies, DoD Boards and DoD Commissions below the aggregate level reported in previous budget submission. Defense Efficiency – Contractor Staff Support. As part of the Department of Defense reform agenda, reduces funds below the aggregate level reported in the previous budget submission for contracts that augment staff functions.
Service Agency Name
Office of Secretary Of Defense

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Cyber
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Contracts
  • Department Of Defense
  • Department Of Homeland Security
  • Detection
  • Detectors
  • Explosives
  • Force Protection
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Physical Security
  • Procurement
  • Security
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Vulnerability
  • Warning Systems
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Readers

  • Critical Infrastructure Protection in CBRN and WMD Threats.
  • Cybersecurity.
  • Defense Acquisition Program Management

Related Documents